⇓ More from ICTworks

Are You Guilty of Helping Safaricom Prey on Rural Women?

By Wayan Vota on November 17, 2016


There are multiple development initiatives to increase women’s ownership and usage of mobile phones – everyone from GSMA to USAID to Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) themselves recognize the digital gender gap as a real issue that needs to be addressed.

While development actors look at how mobiles can increase women’s health outcomes, educational attainment, economic standings, and security perceptions, MNOs are motivated by the profit potential from selling services to half the world’s population.

Might Mobile Ownership Be A Trap?

There are “differential motivations” between what rural women want to do with their mobile phones and what mobile network operators want users to do. These differences affect the design of MNOs products and services, sometimes to the detriment of rural women.

Let’s take rural women in Western Kenya near Lake Victoria. As Susan Wyche, Nightingale Simiyu, and Martha Othieno found in their study, Mobile Phones as Amplifiers of Social Inequality among Rural Kenyan Women, Safarcom’s desire to profit off rural women is so strong that mobile phone ownership became a net loss for rural women.

The study’s rural women participants mostly wanted to use Safaricom‘s network to communicate with friends and family, taking advantage of the nonrevenue-generating services like receiving calls, “flashing”, and sending “Please Call Me” messages. Their use of these services result in little, if any, monetary gain for Safaricom. That is until we look closely at Safaricom’s design decisions, which ensure that the company does benefit from these rural users.

The Skiza Tunes Scam

Safaricom has made it deceptively easy to subscribe to Skiza Tunes, a premium ringtone service that plays music when people call a phone. Please Call Me messages have Skiza ads, and people who call Skiza subscribers are asked to dial 11 if they like the song they hear.

Some women in the study said they like Skiza Tunes, however the majority saw it as a hidden fee that consumed their airtime. That’s a normal complaint, but where is borders on a predatory business practice is the difficulty for people to unsubscribe, particularly rural women who many not have the device literacy, or digital literacy, to follow the abstruse instructions for unsubscribing.

The researchers found that the USSD protocol process requires users to enter a short code, navigate five different menus, answer queries by inputting a number, scroll to the bottom of menus, translate unfamiliar terms (i.e., “Selfcare” and “International Voice Bundles”), and select an option that provides no feedback to confirm that the user has actually unsubscribed. For a rural woman, this complicated process makes unsubscribing from Skiza is a near-impossibility.

Skiza’s cost is automatically deducted from the subscribers’ available airtime, and while its cost stops when it depletes a user’s account, other Premium Rate Services continue to bill users, creating negative balances, and negative impressions of mobile phone usefulness.

For example, as part of the study, the researchers gave the women KS 100 airtime scratch cards, but moments after adding the credit one woman’s phone, she only had KES 4 of airtime. The researchers found that she was subscribed to five Premium Rate services, and had been KES 96 in debt.

The researchers found this loss of airtime to pay off debt was a common occurrence, to the point that the study had to create how-to videos just so women could unsubscribe and stop losing airtime to these predatory services.

Safaricom Preys on Everyone

Interestingly, unsubscribing from Skiza and other Premium Rate Services is difficult for Safaricom more digitally savvy subscribers too, and customer dissatisfaction has reached the point that Cyprian Nyakundi published an Open Letter to Safaricom CEO Robert Bob Collymore showcasing how Safaricom’s relationship with Premium Rate Services is bad for everyone.

These services are offered by a category of companies calling themselves Premium Service Providers. Try sharing this with your friends and you will see the extent to which this fraud is being perpetrated. If there are any people who will find that they have subscribed, chances are that they have no clue how they got subscribed in the first place.

Yesterday, I looked at my daughter’s account and realized that she had subscribed to ELEVEN of these services! I would urge you to tell all your family members to check their accounts too. One of the ways they trick you into subscribing is by having some banner somewhere as you are surfing the net, or pop-ups, which you click accidentally click on.

As much as Safaricom tries to pass the buck to their employees, there is no way they can convince anyone that they are not in on it due to the fact that these service providers that are guilty of perpetrating this fraud are still on their platform. Secondly, they have not gone out of their way to educate their clients about how to unsubscribe from unwanted services.

Why Are We Helping?

Safaricom is not unique in using Premium Rate Services to fleece consumers of their hard-earned shillings. MNOs around the world are getting better at promoting premium services through automated processes that continuously pester for subscription yet are frustratingly hard to end.

The real question is: Why are we helping?

The development community prides itself on being advocates for the poor, and digital development practitioners have the added responsibility to advocate for cyber-marginalized citizens. We should not be blindly driving women to own and use mobile phones, when those devices will only impoverish them further.

We need to stand up to Safaricom, other MNOs, and Premium Rate Service providers, and demand a principled approach to mobile services. The user should not be impoverished, the digitally illiterate should not be exploited, and we all should not be complicit through inaction with either.

Filed Under: Connectivity, Featured
More About: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Written by
Wayan Vota co-founded ICTworks. He also co-founded Technology Salon, MERL Tech, ICTforAg, ICT4Djobs, ICT4Drinks, JadedAid, Kurante, OLPC News and a few other things. Opinions expressed here are his own and do not reflect the position of his employer, any of its entities, or any ICTWorks sponsor.
Stay Current with ICTworksGet Regular Updates via Email

5 Comments to “Are You Guilty of Helping Safaricom Prey on Rural Women?”

  1. Steve Vosloo says:

    Very interesting study and great summary — thanks for sharing this, Wayan.

    I totally support your call for circumspection amongst ICT4D practitioners so that we advance principled developmental aims and not the profit agendas of corporates. But we all need each other as without the MNOs there is no mlearning, mhealth, mpesa, etc. MNOs and service providers need to be regulated. In South Africa there is something called the Wireless Application Service Providers’ Association (WASPA), which plays a key role in regulating the provision of mobile applications and services. If you get subscribed without knowing it, or you can’t opt out, yo complain to WASPA and the offending service may be cut. It’s still too easy to get unwittingly opted in, and often hard to opt out, but the mobile space is definitely safer and more consumer friendly than it was a few years back.

    Are you listening, Safaricom?

  2. Willie Ngumi says:

    Hi Wayan,

    Thanks for the article. i visited the link to Cyprian’s blog and found another blog by Cyprian indicating Safaricom had rectified the mCheza anomaly and demanded refunds from the service provider. http://cnyakundi.com/2016/11/people-power-safaricom-provides-roadmap-for-cheza-games-scam-refunds/ just thought I should highlight that as well.

    • Wayan Vota says:

      Thanks for the follow-up but I don’t think its enough. Safarcom is only refunding people who subscribed to a single game but didn’t download it. Great for a small subset of elite smartphone users, but does nothing about Safaricom’s predatory practices with Premium Rate Services overall.

  3. Dickson Gachuche says:

    Your article hits the nail on the head and I wish you could write to the Communication Authority and the Consumers Federation of Kenya.There are others we are being ffleeced.For example with forced expiry of airtime and data bundles.Unused airtime and data bundles is money and it is our money but safaricom takes it and credits it’s profit.

  4. Interesting article, and I think the point applies not just to partnering with telcos… the truth is that the more successful we are in supporting people trying to improve their education, health and income levels, the more people we are introducing to consumerist economies and the economic and emotional manipulation that shores them up.
    This happens not just ‘accidentally’ but more and more as a direct result of collaborations with the corporate sector – collaborations which are alleged to make projects more sustainable… one has to ask, for whom?