Hive Colab is an open, collaborative, community owned, work environment for young tech entrepreneurs to focus on projects, access the internet, have a quiet professional environment to develop their ideas in, hold events and generally collaborate. Something very similar to what our friends are doing with the iHub in Nairobi.
It will be a space for nascent application developers to register as freelancers, if they are looking for paying projects that people need to be done around the world. An exclusive list of project and clients available through the pan-African consortium of incubators, AfriLabs.
Participant projects will remain wholly owned by their creators, although there there will be access to a network of investors looking to cherry pick some of the more promising ideas for investment, also through AfriLabs.
The only requirement to membership, is that applicants actually be working on projects, and thereafter they must be able to show progress on their ideas to retain membership. This is to keep energy high and to favour people who remain productive. There will be other types of memberships available to be announced soon.
For those who occasionally need space to host events and trainings relevant to the purpose, we are happy to offer Hive Workspace as an open venue. All applications to use the space will be approved by the board. Our goal is to establish the first Hive at the present location, and eventually expand by opening another Hive in a different parts of Kampala to make it a convenient resource for everyone.
It is important that the Hive operate independent of any contributing stakeholders, so that it is not any one person’s or group’s property. Thus, all decisions are made by a community board.
The Hive board currently consists of Teddy Ruge (Project Diaspora), Daniel Stern (UConnect), Solomon King (NodeSix) and Jon Gosier (Appfrica Labs).
Reading this RFA I couldn't help but think about recent Technology Salons that showcased how SMS text messaging can empower healthcare implementers and patient beneficiaries to communicate better and faster, and an earlier Salon with Baobab Health about healthcare in Malawi:
Now with those Salons in mind, I'm struck by how SMS technologies could add sizzle to this proposal by vastly increasing patient care, compliance, and results.
As we've seen with ChildCount+, text messages are an effective way to survey family health and report indicators of disease and solutions like HappyPill can increase drug compliance. In Malawi, SMS:Medic has already showed impressive mHealth results and Baobab Health would be a great local partner. They're managing several health facilities and providing eHealth solutions to the Ministry of Health in Malawi.
So while the RFA doesn't explicitly mention mHealth or even eHealth, either could be the winning advantage for a proposer and a great example of how Technology Salons can inspire innovative proposals for USAID.
Reasons enough that if you're in Washington, DC, you should join us at the next Salon.
Back at the turn of the century, education was gripped by the diffusion of amazing hand-held devices for children. These tools, at first considered an expensive and delicate novelty, soon became standard for every child in wealthy education systems and from there defused around the world to nearly every classroom.
This is actually a description of slate tablets in the early 1800′s, but it could aptly describe the technological revolution we are seeing in education today with low-cost ICT devices.
The rise of ICT devices
From single-purpose educational aids like the Teachermate to commercial netbooks that can be re-purposed for the classroom, information and communication technology is dropping in cost while increasing in functionality and robustness. Soon, these ICT devices will be like slates in the 1800′s – ubiquitous.
Netbooks – one type of low-cost ICT device for education
I invite your input in both. You can modify or download the low-cost ICT devices list itself and comment on the online discussion as the mood strikes you.
Do note that this list isn't expected to be exhaustive, it’s a Quick Guide after all, and we are purposely leaving off mobile phones, as well as the plethora of devices that could be used in education, for a more targeted list of hardware devices that are used in educational systems of the developing world.
In a world of increasing complexity organisations cannot afford to rely only on their own expertise and research. They need to associate, collaborate and share. And innovation is a network-endeavour. It relies on having visibility of and access to the right mix of talent, knowledge, resources and finance.
Open innovation is about combining internal and external ideas as well as internal and external methodologies to advance the development of new models, technologies and services.
To allow this to happen, Brightest Young Minds, a youth driven non-profit organisation, has developed the Open Innovation Studio:
It is a physical environment that combines the attributes of a shared office, a classroom, a coffee shop and a gallery. It also brings together elements of a business incubator, innovation agency, dynamic public space and members club.
Open Innovation Studio’s business is to foster and support socially relevant innovation. Its core product is flexible membership in an inspirational and well resourced habitat in Cape Town where innovators can work, share, learn, and change the world. It is specifically aimed at smaller organisations and solo-flying change agents.
Many computer labs go unused because no one in the community sees the need to use computers and therefore they have not even learned how to use them. Yet the community cannot return the computers nor afford their upkeep.
However, this is not the case regarding a computer lab near me in Kenya. The organization that sold the computers to the community provided intensive training to the lab managers. The youth center that owns the lab has plans to hold classes, as well as use the lab as an information center to educate on and prevent drug abuse and HIV/AIDS infection for the community. This demonstrates that they both had an idea of how to use the computers and had thought of activities for which they could be used.
Sustabale computer lab installation does not stop here
Instead, they faced three simple, yet seemingly insurmountable problems:
Finding someone who could teach the community to use the computers and guide users in finding the information on HIV/AIDS or drug abuse
Finding the money to pay that person on a regular basis
Paying for the Internet access and bandwidth costs
These issues reflect two themes prevalent in many development projects: lack of funding and lack of initiative. First, the director of the program thought there was nothing to do until the money came to pay a teacher. Then he also did not think to volunteer as an instructor, or ask his center manager (also trained on computers) to volunteer, or search for a volunteer in the community.
About two months ago the missing piece of this lab's puzzle came into the picture: funding. The leadership of a community-based organization (CBO) met the managers of the youth center. After the CBO demonstrated that they were working with ICT and were knowledgeable about open source operating systems and packages (which this lab was running), the seeds of partnership were planted.
The CBO and the director of the youth center are now near signing an agreement whereby the CBO teaches computer classes to the youth center's target population at for small fee, and, in return, they have access to the computer lab to do their administrative work. Future plans to supply Internet access to the lab through the CBO's project are in progress.
The moral of the story is this, lack of knowledge on how to use or the usefulness of computers is not always the cause for computer's disuse in less developed countries. In some situations, the owners/managers are simply waiting for other pieces to fall in place.
Human capacity barriers are some of the most difficult to deal with in community-focused projects. Overcoming them is simply a matter of finding the right outlet for the resource that is needed. As we all know, change often takes time.
Soon, this lab will be drawing the community in for lessons provided by their fellow community members. As in all other endeavors, ICT for development projects should not end with hooking up the technology, it is finding the connections or resources needed to make it usable and useful for the target population.
Children playing on merry-go-rounds can pump ground water to a storage tank, and ads on that tank can pay for pump maintenance. That's the simple idea behind PlayPumps International, which went from a small South African effort to a multi-donor cause célèbre to most recently, a poster child for good intentions gone bad in Africa.
You can read more about PlayPumps manyissues and eventual failure on other websites. Here on ICTworks, I wanted to focus on the implementation issues that we in the ICT4D field can learn from a water pump failure. Working from a WaterAid report on PlayPumps International, I've found these six implementation issues with their model:
Now let's translate these issues into lessons that we can apply to ICT4D projects - any ICT project, using any technology in Africa:
1. Keep it cheap
Rural and underserved communities are also poorly resourced and financed communities. They often lack the resources to pay for new technology themselves and those that would donate to them have many other competing communities who need the same resource. So no matter who is paying for the technology, keep it as cheap to install as possible, as this is the first and foremost barrier to adoption.
2. Explore all options
No matter how cool or innovative you think your technology is, there is always an alternative technology. It may not be as exciting to you, but its there and being used by other communities. In ICT, we often forget about older, proven technologies like FM radio or even last year's must-have technology - both which can be easier to obtain and work with than today's cutting edge gadget.
3. Keep it simple
Africa is a punishing environment that's unforgiving on ICT systems and tech support is often very distant and expensive to obtain. So engineer any solution to be easily repaired by minimally trained technicians. This doesn't mean reduce functionality or benefits, but to be sensible about what will last over the long term.
4. Use common components
While it can be troublesome to get custom components when you're developing an ICT tool in an R&D setting, its almost impossible to get and install those same components in rural Africa - be it software or hardware. So design your solution using easily available parts in the communities in which it will function.
5. Install in an enabling environment
This may come to a shock to ICT practitioners, but not everyone knows how to use digital tools, or even wants to. Make sure, before you install, that the community that will use your solution, really wants the solution and sees the benefits to its usage. Also, make sure there are local champions of influence who are eager for the change the solution will bring.
6. Have dedicated administrators
The administration of ICT solutions (vs. just using them) requires a specific, advanced skill set. Yet without a skilled administrator to apply regular maintenance, any ICT solution will fail. So don't entrust this key success factor to just anyone - make sure there is an identified, compensated ICT solutions administrator involved in every aspect of the project.
Conclusion
While PlayPumps International focused on water issues, its challenges are no different than the ones faced by ICT practitioners who deploy digital technology in Africa. We all need to develop appropriate solutions that are welcomed by the recipient community and sustainable over the long term.
Hopefully, these 6 lessons learned from PlayPumps can improve our own implementation efficiency and avoid their same fate.
Attending the Tandaa symposium in May 2010 organised by the Kenya ICT Board to enhance digital content, film and animation, I was impressed by the cue to creating local content simply described by Dr. Ndemo Bitange the permanent secretary in the Ministry of Information Technology and Communication.
In plain words he said "unlike in other developed countries where their potential is realised, there is a lot of power for Kenyans to seize up, through enhancement of digital content."
A challenge to the permanent secretary was to address the question.. "what can the Kenyan government do to empower local talent to create local digital content and generate income?" As all 'political' replies, the PS reiterated the government commitment to motivating development of local digital content, but noted the bulk of the burden was on Kenyans to work on rather than the government. He reminded the audience of regulations of broadcast in Kenya that direct that 40% should be local content. He noted the 'ignorance' of opportunity represented by entry of digital television and broadband internet in Kenya.
Kenya ICT Board Content Grants
Therefore when a few weeks I was attending the Barcamp Nairobi events there was news of an ICT Board grant to Kenyans to work on digital content, I was moved by the effort made. The grant of 4 million dollars has 2 categories- one addressing government services and another for application development. The target group also falls within 2 categories, for firms registered ion Kenya that can apply for up to 50,000$ and for individuals qualifying for 10,000$.
The grant mainly targets startup companies, but existing projects qualify if the funds will be utilized for further development and not marketing. Despite the fact that the target is 46 grants this year, the ICT board had received 500 applications within 10 days of posting. A panel of 9 judges will have the daunting task of assessing the winning applications.
Mwananchi Impact
What does the grant mean to the ordinary 'mwananchi'? I like the approach that the ICT board utilized in recruiting applications. Allowing individual submission means that there will be stiff competition but at the same time allowing for a variety of submissions. Moreover there is opportunity that is presented away from the usual bureaucratic tendering process of the government.
The regional workshops that have been organised by the ICT board serve as a good platform of information dissemination. The fact that government employees (except those in the ministry of technology and communication) and even students will apply is a good case in point of creating opportunity for income generation.
I have not succeeded in writing a successful grant application despite many application to the international forums. In a wrong assumption probably but the grant writing skills and project management will be a big challenge to Kenyan youth applying for this grant. Language barrier (Kiswahili is not accepted as a language of submission) will be a factor. The very short word requirements are appropriate but are crucial in terms of a quality submission.
That not withstanding I am settling down to finish my application - the deadline for the Digital Content and Software Application Grant is this Monday, get your proposal in now!
I hopefully will write in future on writing a successful grant application to the ICT board in next years call for application....
Back in May Microsoft launched a new mobile device that struck somewhere in between a feature phone and a Smartphone. Yesterday, barely a month after the Kin launch, Microsoft pulled the plug on Kin saying it was integrating it's Kin and Windows Mobile development teams.
Microsoft said Wednesday it has stopped work on the Kin to focus "exclusively" on Windows Phone 7, the company's new smartphone operating system that's scheduled to ship later this year. The Kin was built and promoted to attract a younger, social networking-oriented audience.
"We have made the decision to focus exclusively on Windows Phone 7 and we will not ship KIN in Europe this fall as planned. Additionally, we are integrating our KIN team with the Windows Phone 7 team, incorporating valuable ideas and technologies from KIN into future Windows Phone releases. We will continue to work with Verizon in the U.S. to sell current KIN phones."
Apparently Verizon, the provider for Kin in it's short lived life had already cut the price of the phone by 50% on both models, making it fairly affordable for your typical mobile phone user in Africa and other developing nations where mobile phone use has sky rocketed over the years:
The Kin One, the lower-end model, dropped from $50 to $30, while the Kin Two, went from $100 to $50.
Now, this is just interesting (not referring to Microsoft's pulling out a product from the market a few weeks after launch) - but even more interestingly is the fact that Ken Banks, the guy who started off the award winning FrontlineSMS, a while ago wrote a blog titled "The “emerging market” handset trap" about the need for low priced, higher featured phones than the typical Nokia 1100-type phones that are typical of developing markets. Ken's rationale follows:
Low-cost phones have certainly achieved one thing – low cost – and in price terms they’ve done exactly what they said on the tin.
Over the past five years or so, prices have indeed steadily dropped, as we can see if we pick an early "emerging market handset" winner from 2005 (the Motorola C113), a ZTE phone widely available in East Africa in 2008, and today’s Vodafone 150.
The prices may have changed, but functionality has largely stagnated. You couldn’t browse the web on the Motorola in 2005, nor the ZTE in 2008, and today you’d have the same problem on the Vodafone 150. You can’t download applications onto any of them, either. They all have monochrome screens and look pretty-much-the-same despite having a five year gap between them. Very little has changed other than price, it would seem. Voice and SMS remain king at the bottom of the pyramid, or so it would seem.
The real trick is to reduce the price of these phones whilst at the same time increasing (or at very least maintaining) functionality, a combination which no manufacturer has yet managed to crack. Nokia’s announcement last week of their cheapest 3G-enabled phone for the Indian market shows prices are shifting downward for data enabled phones, but at $90 it’s still some way off what most would consider affordable for the remaining 1.5 billion people in the world without a phone.
From today’s announcement, a sub-$40 smart phone – which really would change the game – looks to be as far off as ever.
Well... here's Microsoft with a fairly highly featured phone at just the right price (below $40 and just above $40)...
Straddling the fence somewhere between a dedicated smartphone and high-spec feature phone..
And they are pulling the plug on a potentially game changing device in developing markets! This may be speculative... but why not offer it to developing regions such as Africa, applying to it the same business models and service models such as no contracts - buy the phone up front, prepay models, opened up to whichever mobile service provider the consumer prefers....???
In February 2008, The Health Metrics Network (HMN) convened experts in Geneva after many months of focused organizational, advocacy and educational efforts in several countries.
The goal of the event was to test interoperability of core elements of a district-level health solution that would be repeatable across the dozens of countries in which HMN is currently working.
Inveneo participated in this meeting and what follows is a brief discussion of four key ICT challenges identified by the HMN working group and how Inveneo is seeking to overcome them.
Power Challenges
Lack of consistent and affordable electricity is the single greatest challenge in designing a computing infrastructure for rural health informatics (or any other application for that matter). The vast majority of health facilities in remote parts of the developing world have no mains power and, where available, such power is usually extremely unreliable or so unstable that it poses a threat to unprotected electronic equipment.
Among off-grid health facilities that nevertheless have power, diesel generators are the most common source. But increasing fuel costs and on-going maintenance problems mean that generators are seldom run for more than a few hours a day (often only during medical procedures that require powered equipment) and are prone to abrupt and unannounced failure. Alternatives such as solar panels are simply cost prohibitive when deployed to support standard computing hardware.
Pending the decades long process of extending stable, grid power to remote communities or the advent of an entirely new computing paradigm, the logical immediate answer to this challenge lies in low-power-consuming hardware. Fortunately, hardware now exists that is cost-effective to run on solar (or other renewable) or in partial-grid power.
For example, the Inveneo High-Efficiency Computing Station (PDF) draws just 17 watts of power, compared with 50+watts for a typical laptop, well over 100w for a new desktop and over 150-200w for an older workstation with CRT monitor.
Along those same lines, the Inveneo R4 Hub Server draws under 30 watts, compared with 200w or greater for many new servers.
Due to a number of factors, including increased energy cost, the market shakeup due to the proliferation of mobile platforms, increased focus on "bottom of the pyramid" opportunities, not to mention pressure from Inveneo and other integrators, chip makers are now paying more attention to power efficiency, which should increase availability of processors that can support cost-effective health applications in the developing world.
Efforts are also underway with DHISv2, OpenMRS and other health applications to minimize their system resource requirements and on other ways to improve overall performance on low-power, energy-efficient hardware platforms. This work is a prime example of where closer collaboration between hardware designers and those working on health applications can lead to better integration, repeatability and performance.
Environmental Challenges
The physical environment in most rural and remote settings is characterized by some combination of heat, dust and humidity, each of which is a challenge for standard computers. High speed CPUs generate enormous amounts of heat that, if not properly dissipated, reduces performance or can render these systems inoperable. Dust threatens sensitive electronics by shorting circuits and impeding airflow and heat dissipation. Humidity leads to condensation, corrosion and even mold, all of which can cause electrical problems and possibly shorten equipment lifespan.
Besides reducing power costs, power-efficient computing also helps to resolve these environmental challenges. CPUs with slower clock speeds generate less heat and, with appropriate thermal design, can be deployed without fans. This allows computer enclosures to be better sealed against these threats as well as vermin of various sorts. Fewer moving parts also means greater reliability and lower overall operating costs. In exceptionally remote and/or hot environments, solid-state flash memory can be substituted for hard drives, which are prone to failure in extreme heat and are a common failure point requiring support.
Connectivity Challenges
Lack of affordable connectivity and bandwidth is the primary obstacle to several of the most promising health applications for rural areas, including tele-medicine and other real-time diagnostic support and training initiatives. Lack of connectivity also complicates more basic efforts to collect and analyze health information.
For example, managing electronic medical records for peripatetic patients requires some means of accessing patient information from multiple locations. Similarly, accurate and timely health statistics are extremely difficult to compile in the absence of some form of connectivity, as is managing logistics or other key processes. Finally, lack of reliable connectivity complicates core IT functions, such as systems updates and virus control, thus increasing costs while reducing use value.
Once again, however, tools now exist to overcome these challenges for a growing portion of the communities in questions. The dramatic expansion of cellular networks across Sub-Saharan Africa means that affordable data services are now available for the first time in many areas. Although most cell networks do not yet provide high-speed connectivity (at least not in rural areas), they can support a number of valuable asynchronous and low-bandwidth applications, like email, which are easy to use, powerful and sustainable. As these networks expand and are upgraded, they will provide crucial connectivity for a large number of rural communities and will be better able to support data-intensive applications.
Open protocols, such as WIFI, and durable off-the-shelf products offer an alternative, often complementary, approach. Work done at UC Berkeley in the TIER group's the "WILD" project and elsewhere has adapted the core protocols for WIFI to allow increased bandwidth over long distances. And equipment maker Ubiquti has developed a comprehensive line of durable yet inexpensive WiFi antennas that Inveneo has certified as appropriate for rural wireless networks:
The technology relies on line-of-site, but for less than $1000 it is now quite simple to create a reliable broadband (6mbps) link over distances as great as 100-200km. Such links can be used to extend low cost Internet connections in urban settings to the near periphery at low cost or to share a VSAT connection to multiple facilities in more remote settings.
Even in the absence of Internet service, this approach can support high-speed networking among health facilities to deliver access to shared resources, tele-medicine, tele-training, VOIP telephony or other applications that require higher bandwidth.
Still, while connectivity options are improving, careful design for low-bandwidth and delay tolerance remain critically important. Only systems-level design that accounts for system resource as well as networking constraints can support this objective.
Human Resources and Other Non-technical Challenges
As important as these physical and infrastructural challenges are the many human factor and institutional obstacles to sustainable health information solutions in underserved areas. A partial list of these includes:
Inexperienced computer users
Lack of trained technical support
Absence of defined, action-oriented health indicators
Uncoordinated or absent governance mechanisms
Inadequate oversight and/or incentives for health workers
Widespread poverty and associated security risks
It's worth noting that to succeed health information solutions for rural and remote environments must accommodate inexperienced computer users and novice administrators, not visa versa. This is true both for usability and resiliency. In settings where users may be encountering a mouse and keyboard for the first time, an intuitive and simple interface are critical - "less is more."
Health Information Stakeholders Meeting: Kono District, Sierra Leone
Even when users are more sophisticated, lack of qualified on-site (or even in-district) technical support means that systems must be "hardened" against not just the physical environment but against user error as well.
One way to do this is to "lock down" the file system of the computers so that users cannot inadvertently delete system files or install viruses or other malware. If the system does somehow become mis-configured or infected, a simple on-off cycle will return the machine to its originally configured state.
Server software can include similar controls that streamline and simplify the process of configuring and managing workstations and system resources connected to a local or wide area network.
Conclusion
Itis increasingly clear that information is the lifeblood of a healthcare system. Accurate, timely and accessible health information strengthens literally every part of the system, from policy making, to clinical treatment, to logistics and training. In contrast, inefficient health information systems suffer from an informational anemia that weakens the entire system.
Sadly, all too many health systems in the developing world still suffer from the equivalent of information shock; a system-threatening condition characterized by the inability to generate, access or act on even the most essential health information.
Success or failure of ICT deployments in rural healthcare depends on access to affordable, integrated solutions that are both sustainable in low resource settings and customizable to local conditions. Inveneo is actively developing and deploying such systems specifically to address this need.
Recently, Moses Kemibaro present the marketing plan for the .KE top-level country domain, managed by the Kenya Network Information Centre (KENIC). In his presentation, he asks an intriguing question: Are .KE domain names really expensive?
Now I wasn't at the presentation to hear his thoughts, but from the slide show, I will assume that he feels that .KE domain names are not that expensive. I respectfully disagree.
.KE domain names are way overpriced
The real question that Moses should be asking is, "Are .KE domain names relatively expensive?" See, its not that .KE registrars are making 75% profit, like .com registrars, its that new web entrants, which they're targeting with the me.ke marketing plan, are going to be price sensitive.
At $5 or less per year for the more widely known .com domain name, the $45 per year fee for a .KE domain is crazy expensive. Add to it that young Kenyans (the assumed me.ke target market) have less to spend on domain names, and I say that KENIC should be trying to price personal .KE domain names at $2 or $3 per year.
Give me.ke domain names away!
In fact, I say that KENIC should be giving away the first year of a me.ke domain name. Why? Because the owners of a me.ke domain will invest in it, to make it real and respectable - its thiername.ke after all - and when year 2 comes along, they'll pay $5-10 to keep their new address alive.
A great example of this marketing plan as a successful business strategy is 1&1.com, the giant German web host. They give away the first year of a domain name and add on many important features for free, because they know that once a person (or business) invests in a domain name, they'll want to keep it.
And I should know. I've owned wayan.com, wayan.org, wayan.net, and wayan.us for a decade now.